Soldier Blog Post

Guest Lecture - P.W. Singer,

November 6, 2009

Before I get into the meat of this post, here's a quick note about the JAG School's 'Non-attribution Policy' -- in order to encourage the free expression of ideas and foster robust discussion, the opinions offered by students, faculty, and guests are to be kept private.  This allows us to have really great discussions about really tough topics without the stifling effect you might expect because of fear for negative career effects.  And our guests can rest assured that anything they say won't be used against them or taken out of context after a visit here.  Out of respect for this policy, I solicited Dr. Singer's consent before writing about his lecture today.

And what a lecture!  This was BY FAR the best event of the year to date.  Dr. Singer spoke for an hour about the way warfare is changing with the development and use of robots for the battlefield (captured in his book, "Wired for War").  But is lecture wasn't so much about the actual technology that's available (or on the way) so much as it was about the issues raised by these leaps in technology.  A recurrent theme was ethics -- how does the availability of such technology (that allows for the remote application of force or the use of force removed from human control) change the way we think about, conduct, and control warfare?

He mentioned at one point how technology has made the battlefront more accessible -- easier communication with Soldiers on the front line; video games that simulate war; the ability to watch YouTube clips of war on your phone, etc. -- and at the same time made it less personal, in a way less real.  It reminded me LTC Dave Grossman's book, "On Killing," in which he argues (among other things) that the way we train our Soldiers for combat has made it easier to wage war but has also dehumanized the cost of war. 

Dr. Singer also talked about the cycle of technological development and the dangers involved in both reluctance to embrace new technology and the tendency to latch onto 'the next big thing' before that 'thing' is actually determined (through competition or real-world testing) to be the best choice.  (One of the examples he used was the Commodore computer -- many of us had them growing up, but they didn't last in the market because there were better ways to do the same thing; the same is true with military technology.)

All in all, it was a great lecture, and I intend to go through my notes this weekend to add a few observations in a subsequent post.  In the meantime, you can learn more about Dr. Singer and his book at wiredforwar.pwsinger.com.

     Previous Post

Officership
October 28, 2009

Next Post     

More questions answered
December 18, 2009

  • 4 Comments
  • Add Favorite
    You must be logged in to use this feature.

Comments

  • Methos

    Nov 13, 2009 4:26 PM

    Major Grimes, I've enjoyed reading your blog. I applied for the Fall Board and felt that my interview went very well. My grades are not the best but I make up for them with my other qualities and my FSO encouraged me to reapply if I didn't get selected this round. Is this just false hope? I would love to be in the JAG Corps. and don't mind reapplying if I don't get selected but I also don't want to get stuck in a cycle in reapplications if I have no feasible chance of ever being selected. I would appreciate your comments and/or advice.

    Thank you.


    Reply

  • MAJ Grimes

    Nov 14, 2009 12:20 AM

    Methos - thanks for reading and good luck with the selection board! Your FSO isn't just feeding you a line -- at every selection board I've seen, we've had applicants selected on their second (or fourth!) round of applying. Each selection board is composed of different members and each member might be looking for a different combination of skills and attributes within our 'total person' concept. The right board for you might just be the next one, so don't be discouraged if you don't get selected the first time around. This is especially true right now because the rate of applications for this board is quite high. It seems the economy is motivating more people to look to the Army as an option, and, of course, more and more people are recognizing the great opportunities in the Army to really develop professional skills (no matter what the economy looks like).

    My advice is, don't worry about grades too much. Of course they're important, but so are a lot of other things. I tell people to focus on the personal statement and try to have a successful interview, let the FSO get a sense of who you are. Beyond that, you can do other things to increase your odds of standing out by being involved in your community and being (or having a plan to be!) as fit as possible.

    Again, good luck,

    MAJ Grimes


    Reply

  • Methos

    Nov 17, 2009 11:11 AM

    Major Grimes, thanks for your reply. I've taken your advice and signed up for a few local volunteer projects in anticipation of my next application. I'm also pushing myself more during my workouts. I enjoyed my interview with the FSO and appreciated his offer to help me in his capacity if I didn't get selected this round. Thanks again for your advice and keep up the insightful blog entries.


    Reply

  • Anon

    Dec 6, 2009 9:32 AM

    Major Grimes: I saw Methos, question and thought I would post mine. I have been reading your blog over the past year. I recently submitted my 2nd Application to the JAG Corps., and am anxiously awaiting the board's decision.

    Needless to say, I'm hoping that I am accepted this time around. However I have been considering what I might do, if I am not accepted. I don't know what could make my application much better, I am about to finish school among the top 10% of my class, and have interned and volunteered in a variety of public service areas. I expect to be offered a job in one of those fields....for someone whose true goal in life is to be a JAG Corps. Officer...would you suggest enlisting as a 27D, or going through OCS...rather than taking a job outside of the army?

    Which do you think would best help my odds of someday becoming a Judge Advocate? Also, if I was to start in another branch, would I be able to transfer after a few years? Just a few questions I had, thank you very much for your time. Hopefully, the points will be moot! Good luck to you Methos.


    Reply

Add Comment


All fields required

Your IP: 38.107.179.209