Soldier Blog Post

Retire or Soldier on?: The essay question

November 15, 2010

Today, while working my way through this week's school assignments, I was instructed to select an argumentative essay topic from a provided list. Among the topics was a selection entitled "should the Military be allowed to recruit in High Schools?". As a recruiter, I was little perturbed that my university decided this topic was even debatable. Recruiting is a series of rejections and negative speculation by others, so I didn't let it bother me long. Instead, I began to ponder a thesis statement and started developing the paper.

I began to write about the "all volunteer force" that our Armed Services have boasted since mid 1973.  At some point I stopped writing and just began thinking about that term - all volunteer force. All volunteer force must have been so named by someone, somewhere who never spent a few years or even a few days in USAREC. The term is misleading in that it implies a literal Army of good citizens wakes up every morning and stands in line at the local recruiting station in eager anticipation of the doors opening, so they can get a uniform and set about the business of defending our constitution. 

Terminology better suited to describe our military is ALL RECRUITED FORCE. Believe me, there is a huge difference. No matter the branch of service in question, I assure you that no recruiter has ever been forced to sit a his/her desk and call out numbers...now serving number 43....for three years or so. There is, I'm afraid, a little more to it than that.

All this leads me back to the irritating question - "should the Military be allowed to recruit in high schools?". I wonder if my university would find less debate in a draft? Somehow I doubt it! It's not as though recruiters are going into schools with caveman clubs and dragging students to MEPS and holding up their right hand for the oath. Most recruiters spend their time in high schools fostering long-term relationships designed to provide students with facts and options to have at their disposal should they chose to select a military option after graduation. Those that join while they're still in high school do so because they, together their parents, see benefit in that option. Parents typically like the sense of purpose it instills, having a reason to graduate ON TIME. They like that someone is mentoring their child and providing a moral compass outside the home. Most students who enlist though, will do it a full two tears after graduation. They will do it after having had a go at college, the workforce, or some other plan. They will do it when they want to get married and need improved medical and monetary benefits. If passing on information to those who ask for it within the walls of the school is a negative thing, it should be considered the same way regardless of the employer or school who is providing that information. 

Do educators at my university think so little of high school students that they presume to know what is best for each of them? I got news....the Military pays for plenty of college degrees! Most military students have a 3.6 or higher GPA compared to a community college that is lucky to even retain 20% of its first year students. Truth be told, most recruiters probably only enlist that small amount of high school students who literally BEG to join, as young people are a bit of challenge in that their minds change frequently. I wonder if the university that found it questionable that recruiters spend time in schools knows the Military only expects about 20% of its total enlistments to come from high school students at all?

I'm quite certain schools enjoy collecting federal dollars to squander, but do they support the brave souls who protect their right to collect that money? Perhaps that would be a better topic for an argumentative essay!

You can probably detect that it annoys me a little when someone - anyone - questions the value in what my Soldiers do every day. It irritates me, just a little, when the Soldier profession is called into question, especially by someone who undoubtedly never served in the Military. 

When my head cleared, I decided this topic doesn't even really deserve a dignified answer at all. A question such as this could only come from the clouded judgement of a fool - a fool with the freedom to ask such a silly question in the first place.

Today I will stay because I love being among the few who dare face such ignorance in the performance of their day to day duties. I will stay another day and continue to lead them in their effort!

Until next time,

Terry

     Previous Post

Retire or Soldier on?: The melting-pot of pride
November 12, 2010

Next Post     

Retire or Soldier on?: Tough Love
November 17, 2010

  • 13 Comments
  • Add Favorite
    You must be logged in to use this feature.

Comments

  • Mike Sz

    Nov 15, 2010 10:27 PM

    I must say that I thoroughly enjoyed this post, and agree with you on your points.

    The recruiting I've seen done in high schools has been all volunteer, go up and talk if you want, but no force at all.q


    Reply

  • Smitty! Retired from USAREC

    Nov 16, 2010 1:00 AM

    An argumentative essay on "Should the Military be allowed to recruit in High Schools?" The essay should be written on, "How will we every survive without Federal Funding for our schools and our children?" 15 years in USAREC taught me that this argument is going to fall on deaf ears. There are few that even care and even less that will listen until you threaten Federal dollars for those that won't allow Recruiters inside. Terry, you and I know that allowing Recruiters in the door is not an effective school program. The good news is that most of those soldiers that carry a bag and "Provide the Strength" are professionally relentless like you. Time and time again, you have proven that in spite of anything else, you were able to succeed. That's why the Army put that diamond on your collar and that's why you should write that essay, so that who ever reads it will understand exactly what kind of soldier you are. BTW, if it were me, I'd stand up in class and throw an American flag over my shoulders while reading it out loud and when I finished reading my essay, I might start to sing the Army Song and cry a little just to sell it! Soldier On Cowboy! Put'em in Boots!! Peace Out!


    Reply

  • Jorge Sague

    Nov 18, 2010 11:19 AM

    I have worked both at MEPS (Testing) and in USAREC as a civilian so I have seen the HS question. My take is this. We have an American Dream that we want for our kids. Many parents want it for their kids but do not have the means to help them get there. The military goes a long way to help our youth get to the American Dream. It is a dream based on education. In my part of the country the path to citizenship is almost as strong as the educational opportunites. To go from green card, no education to college educated citizen with all the opportunities it brings is a good product to present in HS. When I would go to parent nights to talk about ASVAB it was the parents who signed the kids up. I em eligible to retire but continue because I have the priviledge of working alongside the fine soldiers in my BN. The military gave me citizenship and a college education and a middle class in which I was able to raise my kids. To come to serve with my soldiers is not work it is a small way to pay this nation back for all the blessing s that I have.


    Reply

  • Kevin Cahalane

    Nov 18, 2010 12:13 PM

    1SG,

    Maybe you should write about high school recruiting as the most difficult part of the job. Contact milestone requirements alone take up a huge part of a recruiter's time. Opt out letters from parents can shield their children from exposure to the military entirely. While schools are required to let recruiters in, they do not have to give easy access to their students. One high school made us sit in the office and they made one PA announcement that we were there. No-one came to see us. Maybe you should mention how a letter from the guidance counselor is necessary to enlist a senior. That in itself can be challenging because 1) Their job performance is based on college enrollment, and no matter how many times you brief them on Con-Ap, they think community college is a better option and 2) no matter how many time you give them a template of a senior letter, a lot of them fail to get it right the first time.

    I think my point is that, like most civilians, they fail to understand the military and how it works, even though they think they know exactly what goes on. Maybe educating them on the difficulty involved in high school recruiting would keep the question from being asked in the future, at least in that class.


    Reply

  • Edwin

    Nov 18, 2010 12:31 PM

    Let's just bring back the draft. PT harms no one and givng young kids a structure for discipline is something that will enable to them to succeed in life.


    Reply

    • JCD

      Nov 18, 2010 1:31 PM

      Edwin,

      I appreciate your point; however, as a former Army company commander, I can tell you that its better to have one good volunteer soldier than ten who there because they have to.


      Reply

  • Maple Fan

    Nov 18, 2010 12:50 PM

    Well put. My nephew joined the Army Reserve as a high school junior at 17, and he turned 18 last week. He made his own decision and asked his parents to support him. His recruiter provided great info and support. High school students have big decisions to make, and they need honest adults providing them and their families w/information. Thanks for what you do on a daily basis, Sir.


    Reply

  • JCD

    Nov 18, 2010 1:27 PM

    While I agree in principle with what is stated in this essay, I must correct the author on a couple of points. First, yes there has been a time when recruiters sat at their desk as said "Next!" to the people standing in line. Between 9/12/01 and late 2003, there were, very literally, lines of people waiting to join. Second, yes educators think so little of high school students. As a former recruiting company commander, I dealt with 89 high school and college staffs within my company area. One of the highest concentrations of schools in any recruiting company area throughout the US. Educators, as a group, think little of anyone who has opinions different from theirs. I can't tell you how often I have asked the question (and it applies to both parents and educators) "did you raise this kid to make good decisions?" Because if you didn't, don't you think its time to let someone else help out. And if you did, why would you question their desire to join the military.

    As too the primary question of recruiting in high school...it is of vital importance that we recruit in high schools. If you look at the statistics, military life is rarely more dangerous than ordinary civilian life. The press does a wonderful job of making it seem more dangerous but outside of limited incidences and period of combat operations, the life of a soldier is as safe as any other. The difference is the level of guidance that a soldier receives. An 18-year-old straight out of high school (with a few exceptions) is either going to the work force or going to college. Either way, their days of direct supervision are essentially over. Not true with a soldier. The military can show these young people a different path. One that leads to long-term success beyond what most of their peers will ever find. If that same pool of potential recruits were allowed to advance into the adult world before the military could recruit them, how many would be lost to drugs, crime, unwanted pregnancy...the list goes on.


    Reply

    • Reddick Bowman

      Nov 18, 2010 2:42 PM

      Very well put. Population statistics do show and are always presented in the media how this young generation has swerved from following their parents and are in need of leadership!

      As an ex soldier (DD 1968 US Army) I can indeed verify this fact. As a young man, I volunteered (RA), not drafted, and the military helped me to grow up in a way that my parents were not able to. My dad was a WW11 vet and he also would add to this idea; being a young man himself when he entered.

      So, the question as to whether recruitment should be done in schools, as posted already, is simply yes. This is a great time to point out the need for service to a cause greater than self, to young people who are looking for direction, to a great country that can use their abilities for the greater good. And, if one does check the Army's Flickr page and see that this induction, as mentioned above, does fall into no more danger respectively, than many a civilian job.

      Fear feeds on itself, therefore, cast off the fear and soldier on!


      Reply

  • Donziap

    Nov 18, 2010 2:01 PM

    Wow I think there is alot of thought put behind this because it irritated or bothed you. But in all reality it's just a debatable question. People in general are all different in how they feel in what they know and what they experience and their entitled to it because that is what our soldiers fight for including my husband. i know your from a different country and question their recruiting standards you could either land yourself in jail or dead. I value that freedom and I give the upmost appreciation to beable to have that choice.

    From my understanding I would think recruiting is a tough job and highschool is a perfect place for recruiting due to the growth and strengths from bratty punks into respectable honorable men who are or can be shaped into giving the best performance mentally and physically. I will never downplay this particular job and I'm sorry if people irritate you and your situation. I think it is a good topic for debate to learn both spectrums of the scope because it brings out passion and it could possibly enahance the mental capicity to appreciate both sides.


    Reply

  • chaosvoider

    Nov 18, 2010 2:04 PM

    I have to say, I always enjoyed seeing the recruiters at the school, and I hate seeing that it's not nearly as valued as it should be, considering our freedoms thanks to soldiers recruited from ages 17-19 age group. I honestly don't see a problem at all and I think it's a great exposure!

    I really hate too that the news gives the impression that the army life is dangerous, when it's really not that often that the danger arises. Honestly, after looking at the Army's Flickr page, I was pleasantly surprised at what's REALLY going on. I mean... I've been really thinking about joining the military (my dad was in the Army for 23 years), but now I'm excited for when I do join. It's given me a whole different perspective and I feel like I'd be able to do more good as an Army RN than just a civilian RN in any old hospital! :)

    You know, I wish I had gotten a topic like this for my English final instead of "climate change". Ugh...

    Keep up the great work!! :D


    Reply

  • tigressreow

    Nov 18, 2010 2:34 PM

    I'm from the "draft era" when Universities were flooded by men wanting to be teachers to get the deferment. Rich and connected families found ways to get their kids out of military duty. My teenager just completed BCT and I'm ALL FOR THE DRAFT TO BE RESTORED for men and women. Everyone has a service duty to this country, not lip service, find a place for us oldtimers too :) When our frontline Homeland Security is provided by minimum wage TSA screeners something is amiss.


    Reply

  • tgt

    Nov 18, 2010 11:03 PM

    I agree no words could have said it Better


    Reply

Add Comment


All fields required

Your IP: 38.107.179.208