A great leadership discussion on Wednesday has led to more ... and less. I was very excited to share some of my small-group leadership discussion with the rest of the world on Wednesday. We were talking about the challenges of leading warrant officers, enlisted paralegals, and civilians as part of our series of seminar discussion about leadership in the JAG Corps. (I used the #jagcldrship hashtag, so you can check out the discussion on Twitter -- and keep it going.) The big take-away from the discussion was that there was a lot of uncertainty in the room about the role of our warrant officers, our legal administrators. The judge advocates in the room all had some assumptions about what legal administrators should and shouldn't be responsible for, but our collective experiences lacked any sort of coherence in terms of actually understanding their role. On paper, the guidance available doesn't seem to provide much actual guidance, and a few bad experiences have colored much of our judgment of legal administrators, generally.
As expected, there wasn't much participation in the conversation via Twitter. Part of that was my fault - I was using TweetDeck from my laptop and kept posting from the wrong account and dropping the hashtag; being involved in the conversation in the room kept me from complete focus on the (limited) technical requirements of writing it down. Part of it was a lack of interest, awareness, or time to participate -- really, of the handful of people reading this blog, how many have time to stop what they're doing on Wednesday morning for an hour and tune into Twitter? But we did get a few comments (most of which didn't include the hashtag, so they won't show up in the hashtag link above). And more important, the discussion was available to read long after the conversation was over.
Yesterday, I got an email from a friend of mine (warrant officer in the JAG Corps) who said she was interested in the leadership discussion on Twitter. It was clear to her that I/we didn't really have a good grasp of the warrant officers' role in the JAG Corps. She offered to school me - and I've taken her up on it. Even better, she's sent that conversation on to some other warrant officers within our Corps and I think our little one-hour discussion on Wednesday is going to be a catalyst for some re-thinking about where we are the JAGC, whether our actual "corporate culture" matches our hopes and expectations. I know I need to know more, and I suspect I'm not the only one who will get some value out of the larger discussion that's started.
But there is a downside. (But at least it's a pretty minor one.) While that was the first of our leadership discussions I'd planned to live-Twitter, it will unfortunately be the last. Sharing what's happening here at school via Twitter (or this blog) is ok; doing so during class, not so much. So, going forward, I'll recap the conversations as accurately as possible and will share them here. But this means that YOU have a bigger contribution to make! Instead of just 'listening' to me write or tweet about leadership, we need to actually have a conversation. Leave a comment here, or, better yet, comment on Twitter. Just remember the hashtag (#jagcldrship)!
| Tag: jag leadership judge-advocate grad-course tjaglcs jag-corps jagc | permalink — post comment |

